TABLE OF RIGHT DIAGONALS
GENERATION OF RIGHT DIAGONALS FOR MAGIC SQUARE OF SQUARES (Part IIIB)
Square of Squares Tables
Andrew Bremner's article on squares of squares included the 3x3 square:
Bremner's square
| 3732 | 2892 | 5652 |
| 360721 | 4252 | 232 |
| 2052 | 5272 | 222121 |
The numbers in the right diagonal as the tuple (205,2425,25652) appear to have been obtained from elsewhere. But I will show that
this sequence is part of a larger set of tuples having the same property, i.e. the first number in the tuple when added to a
difference (Δ) gives the second square in the tuple and when this same (Δ)
is added to the second square produces a third square. All these tuple sequences can be used as entries into the right diagonal of a magic square.
It was shown previously that these numbers are a part of a sequence of squares and this page is a continuation of that effort.
I will show from scratch, (i.e. from first principles) that these tuples
(a2,b2,c2)
whose sum a2 + b2 +
c2 − 3b2 = 0
are generated from another set of tuples that (except for the initial set of tuples) obeys the equation
a2 + b2 +
c2 − 3b2 ≠ 0.
Find the Initial Tuples
As was shown in the web page Generation of Right Diagonals, the first seven tuples of
real squares, are generated using the formula c2
= 2b2 − 1 and placed into table T below. The first number in each tuple
all a start with +1 which employ integer numbers as the initial entry in the diagonal.
The desired c2 is calculated by searching all b numbers
between 1 and 100,000. However, it was found that the ratio of bn+1/bn or cn+1/cn converges
on (1 + √2)2 as the b's or c's get larger. This means that moving down each row on the table
each integer value takes on the previous bn or cn multiplied by (1 + √2)2, i.e.,
5.8284271247...
Furthermore, this table contains seven initial tuples in which all a start with −1 instead as of +1 as was shown in
Part IIIA. The initial simple tuple (−1,1,1) is the only tuple stands on its own. Our first example is then (−1, 169, 239).
Table T
| an | bn | cn |
| −1 | 1 | 1 |
| −1 | 5 | 7 |
| −1 | 29 | 41 |
| −1 | 169 | 239 |
| −1 | 985 | 1393 |
| −1 | 5741 | 8119 |
| −1 | 33461 | 47321 |
Construction of two Tables of Right Diagonal Tuples
- The object of this exercise is to generate a table with a set of tuples that obey the rule:
a2 + b2 +
c2 − 3b2 ≠ 0
and convert these tuples into a second set of tuples that obey the rule:
a2 + b2 +
c2 − 3b2 = 0.
- To generate table I we take the tuple (−1,169,239) and add 2 to each entry in the tuple to produce
Table I with +1 entries in the first column.
- We also set a condition for table I. We need to know two numbers e and
g where
g = 2e and which when added to the second and third numbers,
respectively, in the tuple of table I produce the two numbers in the next row of table I.
Table I
| 1 | 171 | 241 |
| 1 | 171+e | 241+g |
- These numbers, e and g are not initially known but a mathematical method will be shown below
on how to obtain them. Having these numbers on hand we can then substitute them into the tuple
equation 12 + (en + 171)2 +
(gn + 241)2
− 3(en +171)2 along with n (the order), the terms squared
and summed to obtain a value
S which when divided by a divisor
d produces a number f.
- This number f when added to the square of
each member in the tuple (1,b,c) generates
(f + 1)2 +
(f + en
+ 171)2 + f + gn + 241)2
− 3(f + en +171)2
producing the resulting tuple in table II. This is the desired tuple obeying the rule
a2 + b2 +
c2 − 3b2 = 0.
Table I
| 1 | 171 | 241 |
| 1 | 171+e | 241+g |
|
| ⇒ |
Table II
| 1 | 171 | 241 |
| 1 + f | 171+e + f |
241+g + f |
|
|
- The Δs are calculated, the difference in Table 2 between columns 2 or 3, and the results placed in the last column.
- Note that the third column in Table II is identical to column 2 but shifted up twelve rows.
- The final tables produced after the algebra is performed are shown below:
n
| 0 |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| 6 |
| 7 |
| 8 |
| 9 |
| 10 |
| 11 |
| 12 |
|
|
Table I
| 1 | 171 | 241 |
| 1 | 181 | 261 |
| 1 | 191 | 281 |
| 1 | 201 | 301 |
| 1 | 211 | 321 |
1 | 221 | 341 |
| 1 | 231 | 361 |
| 1 | 241 | 381 |
| 1 | 251 | 401 |
| 1 | 261 | 421 |
| 1 | 271 | 441 |
| 1 | 281 | 461 |
| 1 | 291 | 481 |
>
|
|
f = S/d
| −2 |
| 13 |
| 30 |
| 49 |
| 70 |
| 93 |
| 118 |
| 145 |
| 174 |
| 205 |
| 238 |
| 273 |
| 310 |
|
|
Table II
| −1 | 169 | 239 |
| 14 | 194 | 274 |
| 31 | 221 | 311 |
| 50 | 250 | 350 |
| 71 | 281 | 391 |
| 94 | 314 | 434 |
| 119 | 349 | 479 |
| 146 | 386 | 529 |
| 175 | 425 | 575 |
| 206 | 466 | 626 |
| 239 | 509 | 679 |
| 274 | 554 | 734 |
| 311 | 601 | 791 |
|
|
Δ
| 28560 |
| 37440 |
| 47880 |
| 60000 |
| 73920 |
| 89760 |
| 107640 |
| 127680 |
| 150000 |
| 174720 |
| 201960 |
| 231840 |
| 264480 |
|
To obtain e, g, f
and d the algebraic calculations are performed as follows:
- The condition we set is g = 2e
- Generate the equation: (12 + (en + 171)2
+ (gn + 241)2
− 3(en + 171)2 (a)
- Add f to the numbers in the previous equation:
(f + 1)2 +
(f + en + 171)2 +
(f + gn + 241)2
− 3(f + en + 171)2
(b)
- Expand the equation in order to combine and eliminate terms:
(f2 + 2f + 1) +
(f2 + 2enf +
342f + e2n2 +
342en + 29241)
+ (f2 + 2gnf +
482f + g2n2
+ 482gn + 58081) +
(−3f2 − 6en
f − 1026f − 3e2n2
− 1026en − 87723) = 0 (c)
-
−200f + (2gn
f −4en f)
+ (g2n2
− 2e2n2) + (482gn
− 684en) − 400 = 0 (d)
- Move f to the other side of the equation and
since g = 2e then
200f = (4e2n2
−2e2n2) +
(964en − 684en) − 400
(e)
200f = 2e2n2 +
280en − 400 (f)
- At this point the divisor d is equal to the coefficent of f,
i.e. d = 200.
For 4 to divide the right side of
the equation we find the lowest value of e and g
which would satisfy the equation.
e = 10 and g = 20 are those numbers.
- Thus 200f = 200n2 + 2800n − 400
and (g)
f = n2 + 14n − 2 (h)
- Therefore substituting these values for e, f and g into the requisite two equations affords:
for Table I: (12 + (10n + 171)2
+ (20n + 241)2
− 3(10n + 171)2 (i)
for Table II: (n2 + 14n − 1)2 +
(n2 + 24n + 169)2 +
(n2 + 34n + 239)2
− 3(n2 + 24n + 169)2
(j)
Thus the values of the rows in both tables can be obtain by using a little arithmetic as was shown above or we can employ the two mathematical equations to generate
each row. The advantage of using this latter method is that any n can be used. With the former method one calculation
after another must be performed until the requisite n is desired.
- Square A example of a magic square of order number n = 4 produced from the tuple (71, 281, 391).
Squares B and C are magic squares of order n = 7 produced from the tuple (206, 509, 679).
The magic sums in this case are 236883 and 651468, respectively.
Magic square A
| 2742 | 8920 | 3912 |
| 156766 | 2812 | 342 |
| 712 | 3862 | 82846 |
|
| |
Magic square B
| 4362 | 69496 | 6262 |
| 418936 | 4662 | 1242 |
| 2062 | 6042 | 244216 |
|
| |
Magic square C
| 7882 | -361352 | 6262 |
| -11912 | 4662 | 6682 |
| 2062 | 8922 | -186632 |
|
This concludes Part IIIB.
To continue to Part IV.
Go back to homepage.
Copyright © 2011 by Eddie N Gutierrez. E-Mail: edguti144@outlook.com